THE INVESTIGATION STUDIO · CLASSES 7

Can these triangles coincide?

Can a reflected triangle still be congruent to its original?

Working original modelDetailed mapping provisionalBrowser-local notebook
DESIGN A FAIR COMPARISON

Set up your investigation

Compare a candidate triangle with a fixed 3–4–5 reference using all three side lengths.

3 units
4 units
0 units
Original side of base

Write at least 8 characters. Each trial keeps its own inputs; later control changes do not rewrite earlier observations.

MAKE THE RELATIONSHIP VISIBLE

Observe the model

Your experiment starts with a prediction.

Set the controls above and run a trial. A diagram, exact quantities and an explanation will appear here.

EVIDENCE, SIDE BY SIDE

Your laboratory notebook

Keep up to 8 trials for this investigation. Compare two recorded observations with exactly one changed control. Writing is saved as participation evidence.

No trials yet. Start with the setup above.

A controlled comparison needs two observations with exactly one changed input.

TURN AN OBSERVATION INTO AN EXPLANATION

Test your reasoning

Reflecting a triangle without changing its dimensions makes it…

Use at least 40 characters, a result from each trial and one model limitation. Your writing is not automatically graded.

Build your investigation evidence

  • ○ Two observed trials with one changed control
  • ○ Mechanism / reasoning check
  • ○ Written explanation of at least 40 characters

These practice markers recalculate when evidence changes. They are not an official grade or a claim of mastery.

SOURCE CONTEXT IS SEPARATE FROM SOFTWARE STATUS

Curriculum and provenance

This is an original working investigation. Its selected source context does not establish full chapter coverage, official endorsement or prescribed-practical status. Detailed objective mapping remains provisional. Qualified subject-educator review is pending.

View the curriculum inventory and verification boundaries →